P. v. Waltz
After defendant admitted that he was in violation of his probation, the trial court revoked probation and imposed an aggregate four-year state prison term. Defendant argues that inclusion of incorrect information in the probation report created bias on the part of the sentencing court. He also contends that revocation of probation was error, as was the imposition of multiple sentences for his two convictions. We conclude that no bias on the part of the court appears in the record, the revocation of probation was not an abuse of discretion, and the imposition of multiple terms for the separate criminal acts was proper. We therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Waltz