In re B.O.
L.O. (Father), the presumed father of B.O., L.O., and E.O., appeals from the dispositional order in this dependency case. The juvenile court declared the children dependents of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300)[1] and ordered them placed in the custody of their mother, D.O. (Mother). Mother was ordered to receive family maintenance services. (§§ 362, subd. (b), 16501, subd. (g).)
On appeal, Father contends the juvenile court erred by failing to make an order regarding his visitation with the children. He further contends that the juvenile court erred by either (1) impliedly finding that proper notice was given under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) or (2) failing to make any finding regarding the sufficiency of the notice given under the ICWA.
For reasons that we will explain, we will affirm the juvenile court’s dispositional orders.
Comments on In re B.O.