legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Kashani

Mirmassoud Kashani appeals two restitution orders arising from his convictions of various crimes. The details of those crimes and convictions are set forth in this court's nonpublished opinion in People v. Kashani (Oct. 26, 2012, D059467). The first restitution order, made on February 10, 2011, was in favor of First Franklin Financial and in the amount of $163,270. Kashani's challenge to that order was litigated in No. D059467, and he may not challenge the order again in the instant appeal. The second restitution order, made on June 14,
2012, was in favor of Fieldstone Mortgage and in the amount of $152,418.50.[1] At the restitution hearing, Kashani did not contest the amount of the loss Fieldstone Mortgage suffered. He now contends, as he did at the hearing, that the restitution award to Fieldstone Mortgage violates the antideficiency statutes (Code Civ. Proc., § 580a et seq.).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale