Sarkisian v. U.S. Bank
Plaintiffs and appellants Anooshavan Sarkisian and Roobina Sarkisian (plaintiffs or the Sarkisians), husband and wife, challenge the validity of a foreclosure sale of their real property located at 1418 Norton Avenue in Glendale (the property). They contend that defendants and respondents U.S. Bank, N.A. (U.S. Bank), Countrywide Home Loans Inc. (Countrywide), Recontrust Company, N.A. (Recontrust), Bank of America, N.A. (B of A), BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (BAC) and Darrell Schiffer (collectively, the bank defendants) engaged in a tortious scheme to obtain title and possession of the property. Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (FAC) set forth numerous causes of action, including quiet title. The trial court sustained the bank defendants’ demurrer to the FAC and then entered judgment in their favor. On appeal, plaintiffs’ main argument is that the trial court erroneously sustained the demurrer. We shall reject all of plaintiffs’ arguments and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Sarkisian v. U.S. Bank