legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Flores v. Hagobian
Article VI, section 13 of the California Constitution provides, in part: “No judgment shall be set aside, or new trial granted, in any cause, … for any error as to any matter of pleading, or for any error as to any matter of procedure, unless, after an examination of the entire cause … the court shall be of the opinion that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.” While the procedures involved in the present case have, in some instances, been unusual, upon review of the entire record we are satisfied that there has been no miscarriage of justice. That is, the net result of dismissal of appellant Connie Flores’s causes of action against Dennis Hagobian and the other respondents could have been accomplished pursuant to regular procedures and, in the proceedings that actually occurred, appellant had a full and fair opportunity to be heard. We also conclude the superior court correctly decided appellant did not have standing to pursue any cause of action in the second amended complaint, and the complaint was properly dismissed. Accordingly, we affirm the superior court’s order of August 24, 2011, denying appellant’s motion to vacate the clerk’s dismissal of this action.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale