legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Escobedo
Defendant Jose Escobedo appeals from his conviction by plea to a felony narcotics offense. The plea was entered pursuant to a plea bargain which occurred after defendant’s Penal Code section 1538.5 motion to suppress was denied by the magistrate and his Penal Code section 995 motion to set aside the information was denied by the trial judge. The sole issue on appeal is whether these motions should have been granted on the ground that the evidence against defendant was the product of a Fourth Amendment violation. We conclude that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure, and that the rulings of the magistrate and the trial judge are amply supported. We shall affirm the judgment of conviction.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale