In re David M.
David M. appeals from an order of wardship (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) following a finding he committed the crime of grand theft auto (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (d)(1)).[1] He contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the juvenile court’s finding. We find the evidence sufficient and affirm.

Comments on In re David M.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced