In re Brianna B.
Appellant Carlos G., the biological father of Brianna B., argues the juvenile court erred by denying his request to continue a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] in order to set a contested hearing at a later date. He also contends the court erred in stating that it was only terminating the parental rights of the child’s mother and presumed father, Martin R. We find no reversible error and affirm.
Comments on In re Brianna B.