legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.A.
M.S. (mother) appeals from the court’s orders denying her petition for modification (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388; all further statutory references are to this code) and terminating her parental rights to her now almost five-year-old son, T.A. (the child). She contends the court abused its discretion in summarily denying the petition without a hearing and finding the benefit exception under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) inapplicable. Finding no error, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale