Zahorik v. Sweeney
Martin A. Zahorik, in propria persona, appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8, subdivision (a) in favor of John E. Sweeney and Helen C. Sweeney (the Sweeneys) and Sepulveda Escrow Corporation on Zahorik’s claim for breach of contract, negligence, and declaratory relief.[1] Zahorik contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for appointment of a trustee; denying his motion for a discovery referee; denying his motion to amend the complaint to add a fraud cause of action; denying his motion for appointment of counsel; denying his motion for personal appearance at trial; denying his request for a jury trial; and granting Sepulveda Escrow’s and the Sweeneys’ motions for judgment. In his reply brief, Zahorik contends that he could not provide a reporter’s transcript because he is indigent. We affirm the judgment because Zahorik failed to provide an adequate record for review.
Comments on Zahorik v. Sweeney