legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mordick
Defendant William Gregory Mordick appeals from the judgment entered in 2010 after a jury found him guilty of first degree murder of his wife, Katherine Mordick,[1] in 1983. We affirm. For the reasons we will explain, we hold (1) the trial court did not err by denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the case for precharging delay; (2) substantial evidence supported the jury’s verdict; and (3) the trial court’s evidentiary rulings, challenged by defendant, did not constitute an abuse of discretion.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale