P. v. Sahakian
Defendant Garnik Sahakian appeals from the judgment following his convictions for assault with a deadly weapon and mayhem. He contends that, following his request for substitute appointed counsel, the trial court failed to inquire as to the bases for his claim of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Because we find that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Sahakian