P. v. Hermosillo
Defendant Israel Hermosillo appeals from his conviction of commercial robbery (Pen. Code, § 211, counts 1 & 5),[1] attempted commercial robbery (§§ 661, 211, count 3), and assault with a semiautomatic firearm (§ 245, subd. (b), counts 2, 4, & 6) with associated enhancements. Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda) to exclude incriminating extrajudicial statements made while in custody and in response to interrogation. We find no error, and we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Hermosillo