legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Smith
Defendant and appellant Bryan Smith (defendant) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of evading an officer in a vehicle driven in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a); count 1), misdemeanor hit-and-run driving (Veh. Code, § 20002, subd. (a); count 2), and unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a); count 3). Defendant contends the trial court erred by admitting the preliminary hearing testimony of a witness concerning count 3, based on that witness’s unavailability at the time of trial, and that the trial court’s erroneous ruling violated defendant’s federal and state constitutional right of confrontation.
We conclude that the trial court did not err by admitting the prior testimony of an unavailable witness and therefore affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale