P. v. Edwards
Defendant and appellant Kai Edwards (defendant) appeals from his murder conviction. He contends that a telephone call he made from jail consisted of inadmissible hearsay admitted in violation of his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation. He also contends that portions of the gang expert’s testimony should have been stricken due to insufficient foundation. As we find no merit to defendant’s contentions, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Edwards