legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Jordan
Donald E. Jordan appeals a judgment following his conviction for robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). He challenges the imposition of a $154 criminal justice administration fee (Gov. Code, § 29550)[1] and a $38 theft fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.5). Jordan contends an ability-to-pay requirement must be read into section 29550.1 to avoid violating the equal protection clause. (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.) He argues there is insufficient evidence to support a finding he had the ability to pay either the criminal justice administration fee or the theft fine. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale