In re D.D and J.D.
Appellant D.M. (mother) challenges an order under which the juvenile court assumed dependency jurisdiction over her daughters and removed them from her custody. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, 361, subd. (c)(1).)[1] She argues that the judgment must be reversed because the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s jurisdictional and dispositional findings. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re D.D and J.D.