legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Kim
Defendant Dave Dae Hong Kim appeals from the June 15, 2012, postjudgment order directing him to pay restitution on behalf of victim Jack Stotts, Jr., totaling $9,153.42. (See Pen. Code, § 1202.4; all statutory citations are to the Penal Code, unless noted otherwise.) We appointed counsel to represent Kim. Counsel filed a brief setting forth a statement of the case, but advised this court he found no issues to support an appeal. We provided Kim 30 days to file his own written argument, and he has responded with a supplemental brief filed January 22, 2013. After conducting an independent review of the record under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale