P. v. Harvest
Joshua Edward Harvest appeals from a judgment upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of second degree murder. He contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the theories of aiding and abetting of implied malice murder and second degree felony murder. He also argues that the court erred in refusing to strike a co-perpetrator’s testimony who refused to answer any questions despite a grant of immunity. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Harvest