In re S.H.
Defendant and appellant M.H. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] terminating her parental rights to her daughters, then 15-year-old S.H., and then 18-month-old R.T. Mother raises two claims of error. First, she contends, because she had just entered a residential treatment program to address her drug dependency, and therefore was working on her reunification plan, the juvenile court erred when it terminated her reunification services at the 12-month review hearing. Next, mother contends the juvenile court abused its discretion when it denied her section 388 petition. We disagree with both claims and therefore will affirm.
Comments on In re S.H.