In re D.G.
Mother Da.G. and her four children, two who share one father and two who share another father, appeal from the judgment entered after the juvenile court declared the children dependents of the court, placed them with their respective fathers and then terminated jurisdiction pursuant to family law orders. Mother and the children contend that the evidence is insufficient to support the court’s finding that the children came within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g). [1] Because substantial evidence supports the court’s finding under section 300, subdivision (g), we affirm the judgment.[2]
Comments on In re D.G.