legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Angelina M.
J.A. and L.M. appeal orders entered at a permanency plan and selection hearing held under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] J.A. contends the court erred when it found that the beneficial parent/child relationship exception did not apply and terminated parental rights. He also appeals an order denying a hearing on his request to place Angelina in the care of her paternal grandmother. L.M. asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error pursuant to In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952 (Sade C.) and Penson v. Ohio (1988) 488 U.S. 75, 88 (Penson). Upon review of the issues raised in J.A.'s appeal, we affirm the orders. We dismiss L.M.'s appeal.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale