In re Peter G.
Christopher G. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court’s May 22, 2012 orders denying his Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition and terminating his parental rights over Peter G., born in June 2010.[1] Father contends that the court abused its discretion in denying his section 388 petition because he demonstrated a change of circumstances such that a change in placement would be in the best interests of Peter and that the court erred in terminating his parental rights because the beneficial parent-child relationship exception applied. Susan G. (Mother) filed a letter brief under In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952 and In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835. Father adopts by reference Mother’s arguments, but in a separate order filed on January 15, 2013, we dismissed Mother’s appeal. We disagree with Father’s contentions and affirm the orders.
Comments on In re Peter G.