Stirling v. Fremantlemedia North America, Inc.
Shane Stirling appeals a summary judgment in favor of Fremantle North America, Inc. (Fremantle), and The Price Is Right Productions, Inc. (TPIR Productions). She contends the evidence creates a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants terminated her employment as a model on a television game show because of her prior pregnancy and the fact that she was a new mother, contrary to public policy. She also contends the summary adjudication of her counts for negligent hiring, retention and supervision and intentional infliction of emotional distress was error, and challenges the sustaining of the defendants’ evidentiary objections. We conclude that Stirling has shown no prejudicial error and will affirm the judgment.
Comments on Stirling v. Fremantlemedia North America, Inc.