P. v. Barlow
Defendant Prisha Barlow appeals from the judgment entered following her conviction by jury of child endangerment. (§ 273a, subd. (a).)[1] She contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Comments on P. v. Barlow

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced