In re Marriage of Hardiman
Jolynn Hardiman and Roy C. Hardiman[1] terminated their marriage in 2005 and stipulated to a judgment on reserved property and support issues that was entered in 2007. Jolynn appeals from postjudgment rulings that (1) Roy’s receipt of approximately $14 million in proceeds from his exercise of certain Genentech, Inc. (Genentech) stock options in 2005 and 2009 did not increase his child support obligations for those years; (2) Roy was entitled to $40,000 in attorney fees as sanctions for her litigation conduct; and (3) she was not entitled to fees incurred in the postjudgment proceeding based on Roy’s greater wealth. We affirm the trial court’s rulings.
Comments on In re Marriage of Hardiman