Heimuli v. Lilja
Plaintiffs and appellants Eseta Heimuli and her spouse Mike Heimuli appeal a judgment in favor of defendant and respondent physicians James Lilja and Helen Matthews, after the court sustained defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ third amended complaint for medical malpractice and loss of consortium based on the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5).[1] Plaintiffs contend that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend where they alleged they did not suspect that someone had done something wrong until they consulted with their attorney after the surgery on which the malpractice claim was based. We shall affirm.
Comments on Heimuli v. Lilja