In re E.P.
Appellant E.P. was adjudged a ward of the court after entering a plea of no contest to a charge that he was a minor in possession of a handgun. On appeal, he contends the juvenile court erred in denying his motion to suppress, failed to follow statutorily mandated procedures for determining his suitability for deferred entry of judgment, imposed gang-related conditions of probation that are unconstitutionally overbroad and vague, and failed to calculate his maximum term of confinement and award predisposition custody credit. We conclude the motion to suppress was properly denied but agree with appellant that the matter must be remanded for the juvenile court to conduct a hearing to consider appellant’s suitability for deferred entry of judgment.
Comments on In re E.P.