P. v. Benoit
Defendant, Edward Benoit, appeals from an order granting probation following a no contest plea to possession of concentrated cannabis. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (a).) Benoit argues that a condition of his probation requiring him to stay away from places where alcohol is the primary item of sale is unconstitutionally vague because there is no explicit requirement that he can only be punished for knowingly violating this condition. Accordingly, we modify the order to require Benoit to stay away from locations where he knows alcohol is the primary item of sale and, as modified, affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Benoit