legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sterkina v. The Regents of the University of Cal.
This is an appeal from judgment following the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff Sofiya Sterkina’s third amended complaint against defendant The Regents of the University of California (Regents). Sterkina’s third amended complaint purported to set forth a professional negligence claim for injuries she received at the hands of three dentists who performed dental work on her on behalf of the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) Hospital Dentistry/General Practice Residency.[1] The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the third amended complaint without leave to amend after concluding Sterkina’s claims were time-barred. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale