legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.A.
M.L. (mother) is the mother of A.A., born in November 2005. Mother argues the juvenile court erred when it terminated her parental rights and freed A.A. for adoption by her foster parents at a hearing held on January 5, 2012, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Specifically, mother argues the juvenile court should have declined to terminate her parental rights under the parental benefit exception to the preference for adoption, found at section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i). As discussed below, we conclude that, even if mother did not waive this argument by failing to raise it below, it has no merit. Thus, we affirm the juvenile court’s orders terminating mother’s parental rights and freeing A.A. for adoption.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale