P. v. Carr
Defendant Rodney Cyril Carr appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of first degree murder and mayhem, with a finding he personally used a deadly weapon. The jury also found that defendant was sane at the time he committed the offenses. Defendant contends insufficient evidence supports the jury’s sanity verdict and the trial court erred by failing to instruct sua sponte on involuntary manslaughter and by admitting the testimony of a particular witness. He also notes an error on the abstract of judgment. We direct the trial court to correct two errors on the abstract of judgment, but otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Carr