In re M.R
The juvenile court took dependency jurisdiction over six of I.H.’s (mother) children, her 11-year-old son Carlos R., 10-year-old daughter M.R., 9-year-old son W.M., 7-year-old son R.H., 5-year-old son David H., and 3-year-old son Robert H. (collectively the children), based on allegations under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a), (b) and (g).[1] The juvenile court left the children in mother’s custody and ordered family maintenance services. Mother appeals, contending the juvenile court erred in finding jurisdiction under subdivisions (a), (b) and (g), because those findings are not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re M.R