legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.F.
On November 8, 2010, S.F. (Minor) admitted she committed robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211. She was placed on home supervision.
On December 1, 2010, Minor was declared a ward of the court and placed on home supervision.
In April 2011, Minor admitted violating the terms of her probation and she was committed to Breaking Cycles for a period not to exceed 150 days.
In June 2011, Minor again admitted violating her probation and the commitment to Breaking Cycles was extended for 90 days.
The juvenile court conducted an annual review of Minor's status in December 2011. At that time the court concluded Minor had successfully completed probation and terminated jurisdiction. Defense counsel requested the court to reduce Minor's conviction from robbery to grand theft from the person (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (c)). The court denied the request.
Minor appeals contending the trial court erred in failing to understand the nature of its discretionary authority and that it abused its discretion in denying Minor's requested reduction of her offense. We find no error by the trial court and therefore affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale