In re J.P.
Vickie S. appeals the juvenile court’s order issued at a postpermanency review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.3)[1] denying her request for reinstatement of reunification services as to her 12-year-old son, J.P.[2] Vickie contends the juvenile court’s order was an abuse of discretion. We affirm.

Comments on In re J.P.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced