Marriage of Akerlund
In this dissolution proceeding involving a lengthy marriage between Fritz and Jeanne Akerlund, a trial ensued and judgment was thereafter entered.[1] Fritz appeals from the judgment, asserting three claims. First, he argues that the judgment must be reversed because the court failed to file a statement of decision after Fritz made a timely request for one. Fritz contends further that the court erred in denying his request that Jeanne reimburse the community for the value of her exclusive use of the family home for a period of several years, otherwise known as Watts (Marriage of Watts (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 366 (Watts)) credits. Third, he asserts that the court erred in awarding attorney fees to Jeanne without giving consideration to Fritz’s ability to pay those fees.
We conclude that the court committed reversible error by failing to file a statement of decision in response to Fritz’s timely request. Accordingly, we will reverse the judgment with instructions that the trial judge who heard the matter prepare and file a statement of decision.
Comments on Marriage of Akerlund