P. v. Loice
Following trial, a jury found defendant and appellant Hakeem Loice (defendant) guilty of the attempted murder of one victim and a separate assault on another victim by means likely to produce great bodily injury. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to try separately the two unrelated crimes and that the prosecutor committed various acts of misconduct that denied him the right to a fair trial.
We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to try separately the two charged crimes and that the prosecutor did not engage in any prejudicial misconduct. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction.
Comments on P. v. Loice