Pullen v. Unger
The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff Carl M. Pullen’s legal malpractice complaint without leave to amend, concluding it was barred by the one-year statute of limitations for such actions (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.6).[1] Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal, contending the trial court improperly decided issues of fact in reaching this result.[2] We conclude that the trial court properly sustained the demurrer but erred in denying plaintiff leave to amend. The judgment is reversed.
Comments on Pullen v. Unger