P. v. Haynie
Defendant and appellant Marvin Haynie (defendant) was convicted of first degree burglary with a person present (Pen. Code, § 459[1]). On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to strike his prior conviction pursuant to People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero motion). We affirm.

Comments on P. v. Haynie

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced