P. v. Naredo
A jury found defendant and appellant Ali David Naredo guilty of, among other things, involuntary manslaughter of his seven-month-old son. At trial, the People introduced, over Naredo’s objection, his statement to the police that he punched the baby’s head. On appeal, he contends that his statement was involuntary because it was coerced by a promise of a benefit or leniency. He also contends that the trial court improperly denied challenges for cause, admitted cumulative autopsy photographs, and failed to instruct the jury properly. We hold that no prejudicial error occurred and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Naredo