legal news


Register | Forgot Password

G.F. v. Super. Ct.

G.F. (Mother) seeks extraordinary relief from orders of the Alameda County Superior Court, Juvenile Division, entered September 18, 2012, terminating Mother’s reunification services after the six-month status review hearing, and setting a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] to select a permanent plan for her twin daughters, K.F.-1 and K.F.-2 (born November 2011). Mother contends essentially that the juvenile court erred in finding that the Alameda County Department of Social Services (Department) offered or provided her with reasonable reunification services, and in finding Mother had failed to make substantial progress in her court-ordered treatment plan during the period under review. We conclude substantial evidence supports the challenged findings, and deny on the merits Mother’s petitions for extraordinary writ.[2]

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale