In re C.H.
The mother in this dependency case contends the juvenile court erred in asserting jurisdiction over her three children. Jurisdiction was premised on allegations that there was a substantial risk of serious physical harm—future sexual abuse—to mother’s children because of mother’s impromptu marriage to a man the day after his children were detained as part of an investigation that led to separate dependency proceedings involving his four children in which he was found to be a sexual predator. We find no error and affirm the jurisdictional order.
Comments on In re C.H.