P. v. Baker
Defendant Bobbi Baker appeals her sentence, arguing that the trial court erred by imposing three consecutive enhancements for committing offenses while she was released from custody on bail. (Pen. Code, § 12022.1.)[1] Baker contends that only one on-bail enhancement was permissible, and two of the enhancements must be stricken. The People argue that two of the enhancements were proper, but concede that one enhancement must be stricken. Baker also contends that her attorney had a conflict of interest because he represented Baker and a co-defendant at the same time. We will order the trial court to amend the abstract of judgment to strike one of the on-bail enhancements, but otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Baker