J.K. v. Super. Ct.
Petitioner J.K. (father) is the father of nine-year-old H.M. Father challenges the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings and decision to set a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code, section 366.26, to determine a permanent plan for H.M.[1] The court took these actions after father allowed H.M.’s mother[2] to care for H.M. in anticipation of father being returned to custody for violating parole. The courts had previously placed H.M. in father’s sole custody with orders that H.M. only have supervised visits with her mother. Father argues the jurisdictional findings are not supported by substantial evidence. As discussed below, we affirm the juvenile court’s rulings.
Comments on J.K. v. Super. Ct.