Zacky v. Dillon
We revisit a dispute between abutting landowners over the scope and extent of a driveway easement. In 2011, we affirmed a judgment in favor of the dominant tenement owner concerning its rights in a non-exclusive driveway easement. (Zacky v. Dillon (Jan. 6, 2011, No. B217352 [nonpub. opn.] (Zacky I).)[1] We also directed the trial court to clarify certain terms of its judgment on remand. It conducted further proceedings and issued its judgment following appeal. Appellant Scott Zacky, trustee of the owner of the dominant tenement (Zacky) appeals and contends that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction on remand and in effect reversed Zacky I. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on Zacky v. Dillon