Vassiliou v. State Farm General Ins.
Appellant, Andrew Vassiliou, challenges the judgment dismissing his personal injury action against respondent, State Farm General Insurance Company (State Farm), entered after the trial court sustained State Farm’s demurrer to the third amended complaint without leave to amend. The court ruled that the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against State Farm and was uncertain. State Farm was not named as a defendant in the complaint and no facts or theories of liability were alleged against State Farm.
Appellant asserts that, under the Insurance Code and “basic premises liability,†State Farm is liable. However, appellant has neither supported his contention by argument and citation to relevant authority nor met his burden to show reversible error. Moreover, the complaint is insufficient as a matter of law. Therefore, the judgment will be affirmed.
Comments on Vassiliou v. State Farm General Ins.