Vassiliou v. General Electric
Appellant, Andrew Vassiliou, challenges the judgment dismissing his personal injury action against respondents, General Electric Company (GE), Union Carbide Corporation (Union Carbide) and Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (Kaiser Gypsum), entered after the trial court sustained respondents’ demurrers to the third amended complaint without leave to amend. The court ruled that appellant had not stated a cause of action for injury resulting from exposure to toxic materials because he had not alleged that he was exposed to a particular product manufactured by any of these respondents.
Appellant asserts that the information stated in the complaint is “not vague it is factual†and that the “defendants lied and tricked [the] judge.†However, appellant has neither supported his contentions by argument or citation of authority nor met his burden to show reversible error. Moreover, the complaint is insufficient as a matter of law. Therefore, the judgment will be affirmed.
Comments on Vassiliou v. General Electric