legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Mario L.
Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney General, Paul M. Roadarmel, Jr. and Robert C. Schneider, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Appellant Mario L. (minor) appeals from the denial of a petition to vacate an order for restitution and abstract of judgment (Judicial Counsel form No. CR-110/JV-790) on the ground that it was issued after he turned 21 years old, when the juvenile court’s jurisdiction terminated by operation of law. In the alternative, minor seeks correction of the amount of the judgment to reflect the original restitution order of $12,988. We conclude that the juvenile court acted within its authority in issuing the order and abstract of judgment, but did not correctly state the original restitution order. We thus order the juvenile court to issue a new order and abstract of judgment showing the correct amount, and we affirm the order denying the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale