legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Fuller
A jury acquitted Mack Fuller on charges of transportation of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)) and possession for sale of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5), but found him guilty of one count of possession of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)), a lesser included offense of the possession for sale charge. On appeal, Fuller contends the prosecutor engaged in several instances of prejudicial misconduct, and that the trial court erred in denying him probation pursuant to Proposition 36. Fuller also asserts, and the People concede, that the abstract of judgment is incorrect. In addition, Fuller requests that we review the in camera proceedings the trial court conducted pursuant to Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess). We direct the trial court to modify the abstract of judgment, and otherwise affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale