In re Michael A.
Appellant mother seeks to reverse the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights with respect to her son. She contends that the trial court’s finding that the “beneficial parent-child relationship†exception did not apply was not supported by the evidence. Thus, she argues, the order based on such finding was erroneous. We disagree and hold that the mother failed to produce evidence sufficient to show that the child would benefit from continuing a relationship with her or that termination of her parental rights would be detrimental to her son.
Comments on In re Michael A.